Iran, Israel and the USA dominate the world news scene here with
the personal spat between Bibi Netanyahu and Obama monopolizing media reports.
Interestingly, Netanyahu is a conservative who relies on the political right
and extreme right to form a government in Israel. This puts him at odds with
the vast majority of American Jews who reside much more to the political left
and center than Bibi.
Never have American Jews
been so conflicted with respect to their ties with Israel. Their traditional
liberalism goes back into American immigration history and its imported legacy
of anti-Semitism. Only the liberals welcomed, or at least accepted, the Jewish
immigrants. As a result, the offspring of these immigrants continue to support
the liberals.
Such supporters are often wealthy professionals, businessmen,
retailers, landlords and artists who could easily be counted among our
conservative population. Many of our American 'champagne socialists' come from
this type of background. It would not surprise me at all to begin witnessing a
slow but gradual move to the right on the part of Jewish Americans.
As for Iran, our Dear Leader and senior diplomats are still
sucking the dry and bitter fruit of negotiations that are going nowhere. It
would be more realistic to expect world peace than a viable deal with the
successors to the Persian empire. The Ayatollahs will have their nuclear
weapons no matter what and will continue to promote Shiite regimes throughout
the Middle East because it is their nature to do so.
Persia has long dominated all aspects of social, cultural, martial
and economic life in the area in spite of the long-gone Golden Age of the
Arabs. Americans are so fixated on the Saudis and Egyptians that we fail to
examine what is going on among the Shiites and their prime movers in Iran. Bibi
is correct in his desire to control the Iranian regime, but few people are
listening to him and chief among them is O himself.
For his part, O seems to hold the opinion that his own
personal goodwill, charm and vision will miraculously generate a calmer and
more Amerophyle Middle East. (You are right, Ameophyle is not a word, nor
is Amerophobia, but they work for me and perhaps, some day, they will gain
popularity.)
As for the Saudis, they are a third class alai. They are
pathetically soft militarily and their so called air force is peopled by a
bunch of playboy princes who have no stomach for conflict. The ruling elite are
scared to death of the Wahabi religious leaders and of their being outed for
their decadence and corruption. The bottom line is the Saudis are a very small,
easily intimidated and disunited people who are totally dependent on the good
will of the USA for their survival.
Egypt is and has long been an underachieving country with
unrealized potential. Like the Saudis, they rely heavily upon American
political and economic support. For the USA's part, these two
countries provide a buffer between the Arab world at large and Israel.
Just now, Egypt has its own social and economic problems to contend with and
has again reverted to military rule to maintain order.
This country is the theological, intellectual and cultural head of
the Muslim world, but has done little to parley this role into one of regional
equilibrium.
Complicating it all are the ISIL fanatics and their extreme Sunni
Muslim beliefs. Suddenly, the USA's biggest worry in the Arab world is
this spawn of Saudi Arabia and allied Sunni Arab countries who detest the West
as well as their own national leaders.
One light at the end of the tunnel is the prospect that the
fanatical Sunnis will war with the fanatical Shias and thereby substantially
neutralize their respective threats. Evidence of this happening is widening in
places like Nigeria, Libya and even Tunisia. A deeper probe would undoubtedly
explore more such examples. Who knows where this conflict will leave the Assad
regime in Syria, but little by little Assad is looking more and more
reasonable.
By way of conclusion, it should be noted that the American man in
the street has little understanding or interest in the Middle East. Unlike the
liberal Northeast, the population of Texas and the Southwest follows
conservative gut feelings inculcated through a history of immigration from
Northern Europe.
The Southwestern work ethic remains intact and foreigners are
defined as anyone not from here. Middle Easterners from wherever fall into this
category and are accordingly treated circumspectly at best. Politically, there
is much more intrinsic support for Netanyahu's views toward the Arab world than
Obama's even though few people here have any affection for either.
No comments:
Post a Comment