The
hypocrisy over so-called tax dodgers is so thick you could lay it on with a
trowel.
Osborne
tells us that there will be a
‘crack-down’ on tax havens. Well, we know all about his ‘crack-downs; we have
been here before. Remember the ‘Lagarde List’ under which the Swiss government
agreed to provide details of personal deposits by British taxpayers in Swiss
Banks? Of course, the really big accounts are those of major companies, not
wealthy individuals, so the effect was never going to be very dramatic. And so
it turned out. The Swiss were given 18 months grace before disclosure kicked
in, plenty of time to shift the accounts to more accommodating jurisdictions.
And
so it came to pass!
The
tax take from the ‘crack-down’ was derisory, HMRC had only one successful
prosecution, and Switzerland remains at the top of the secrecy’ league table.
Hypocrisy
kicks in big-time in relation to both the UK and the US. These are the world’s
biggest tax havens.
The
favourite US destinations are Delaware with more than 1 million ‘tax efficient
vehicles’, and Wyoming, Nevada and Oregon with nearly 700,000 between them.
There is a TEV for every six residents in Nevada.
Osbourne
reckons to have another tilt at the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands. Since
none is a tax haven and all comply with OECD disclosure requirements the tax
haul will not solve George’s deficit problem any time soon.
Then
there is the essential question: where’s the harm?
The
‘colonial’ tax havens, mostly in the Caribbean, were sponsored by HMG so that
they might become self-supporting. As the Prime Minister of BVI pointed out in
a recent TV interview, if its TEVs were closed down, HMG would be left to pick
up the tab (current BVI GDP is around US$ I billion). The IMF reckons that BVI
holds at least US$ 600 billion, but this is almost certainly an underestimate
that does not take account of massive Chinese inflows in recent years.
Little
of this has any discernible impact on the British people; we should not imagine
in our wildest hallucinations that if Osborne strikes it rich by squeezing the
tax dodgers he will reduce UK income tax, especially after he has finished
refinancing the ’colonials’ from the DFID budget or confer any other benefit on
the taxpayer.
What
has had a massive impact on the people is the euphemistically-named Financial ‘Services’
Industry. It is a midden of chicanery, malfeasance and downright fraud.
Ordinary people who relied upon deposits of their life-savings have seen the interest
income fall to practically nothing, but with breath-taking spreads against loan
rates, because of the world-wide financial crisis brought about by the reckless
greed of financiers. Then there was – and continues to be – the PPI scandal in
which the banks persuaded their customers to divvy-up £20 billion on insurance
against non-existent risks.
And
yet not only do the villains go unpunished but continue to draw salaries that
often border on the obscene whilst continuing to profit from businesses rescued
by the taxpayer.
Barclays
Bank is a classic example. It has over 500 staff who are paid more than £1
million each, and nearly 1500 earning more than £500,000. Since half the remaining
staff actually get paid less than then average wage, it is pretty obvious that
the bank was being run not for the benefit of shareholders, customers or the
workforce but for the fat cats at the top.
The
ethical standards of the industry strike us ordinary laymen as being appalling.
At
one level we have young people getting far too much money, whose sole
motivation is to make as much as possible without any intrinsic job-satisfaction,
and who regularly appear in the Red Tops because of their abuse of alcohol, drugs
and sex. The customers are ‘muppets’, at least within Goldman Sachs. But at the
highest level most malfeasance goes unpunished. In the UK there have been no
prosecutions, although the boss who ruined the Royal Bank of Scotland had to
accept the reduction of his pension to a mere £350k or thereabouts.
Financial
institutions in the US have paid eye-watering fines; their customers’ money. In
Britain we have had the IBOR scandals in which rate submissions were routinely falsified.
But since the days of Gordon Brown politics has been the captive of the City.
Plus
ca change!
No comments:
Post a Comment