Men who spar with Government
To back their blows
Need something more than
Ordinary journalistic prose.
Yes, I know that you are sick
of hearing about the Dirty Digger, but this story will run and run. Get used to
it.
I will make two
predictions:
News International will
survive quite easily but it will sell its print interests. They are not big
money spinners and the Times and Sunday Times lose £70,000,000 a year. They
will be bought by Russian ‘oligarchs’, a euphemism used to describe businessmen
who could not lay straight in bed. And the current witch-hunt will turn public
opinion against the hunters. The truth is that the public just couldn’t give a
damn. To them, this is mob-hysteria amongst the chattering classes. The public
concerns are prices, taxes, jobs and homes – as always. So what, if the
Assistant Commissioner at the Met is so thick he couldn’t go two rounds with a
revolving door?
Restrictions imposed on press
reporting will have no effect on the Red Tops as they don’t print any news, just
tits and bums and fairy stories. If Dave really wants to make a difference I
suggest two simple measures.
First is to select
Parliamentary candidates through primaries. This will encourage MPs to look
after their constituents rather than their public image. Second, prohibit
foreign interests from owning a majority stake in any newspaper or terrestrial
TV news service.
The real story is that the
influence of the print medium is vanishing fast, and the news industry is
literally changing before our eyes. The heyday of the press barons was the
first 60 years of the 20th Century. The culture of deference started to crumble
in the 1960’s which led to the brief reign of the Red Tops, but the high-water
mark was the 80’s when the tabloids tortured the Royal family and ceased even
pretending to report news. Now, the press is being superseded by electronic
media.
TV news now included amateur
videos taken from You-Tube and similar sites. They were used extensively to
cover events in Tunisia, Egypt and especially Syria. The first reports of the
end of Bin Laden were carried on Twitter. They have greater immediacy and seem
more trustworthy and genuine than profession coverage, which can be rigged (I
remember Sefton Delmer’s ‘eye-witness account’ of the mutiny of the Force
Publique in the Belgian Congo in 1960, filed from the bar of the Elephant &
Castle in Ndola, Zambia. ‘As I sit here in the bar of the Hotel Splendido, all
around me men are dropping like flies’).
Then we have Wikileaks which
will continue to torment our masters even if Assanje gets before the kangaroo
court in Sweden. The excellent Al Jazeera is leading the way in using social
media such as tweets, Facebook, and amateur video in its news coverage. We
forget that the age of mass print media was quite modern, created by universal
education. Prior to that news was transmitted – if at all – by word of mouth,
by market place gossip, by pamphlets and other informal means. I believe that
in the mid-19th century the largest newspaper circulation was the Times
with about 50,000. We are moving back to something resembling this, with news
increasingly gathered and circulated by the public.
No comments:
Post a Comment