Just to prove that it sticks by its lefty, PC,
right-on bias in all things, not just its news reporting, the BBC has just started a new season of a ‘tec
series called, imaginatively, ‘Inspector George Gently’.
The
first series was undemanding entertainment for the brain-dead, but it passed a
couple of harmless hours. It was supposed to have been set in the late 1950’s
or early 60’s (the writer and director clearly were unsure, but clearly thought
that such ancient history, years before they were born, had been forgotten, so
attention to fact and detail was not important.
Our
hero leaves the Yard to join the northern plod in pursuit of a criminal who
murdered George’s wife. Of course he nails the villain who is duly topped
– a bit harsh considering that capital punishment had been abolished by that
time. Another episode featured nasty goings on by the IRA several years before
the ‘struggle’ actually began. And the Sergeant has a Beatles haircut long
before John, George, Paul and Ringo, not that a copper would have been allowed
such an extravagance unless he was Drugs Squad or Special Branch.
The
new series is very socially-aware. The first episode was a murder that wasn’t
of a black girl. Actually she was the victim of a hit-and-run, a fact that
would have been noted by the Police Surgeon within minutes of discovering the
body.
The
entire programme was reprise of just about every anti-racist cliché ever heard
– the landlady with ‘No coloured, no Irish, no dogs’ in her window, the Enoch
Powell stuff, the whole bag.
And
the accustomed sloppiness was ever-present. The dead girl’s father was supposed
to have served in wartime RAF, and duly appeared in what purported to be
uniform. Servicemen wore battle-dress throughout the War. This was supposed to
be service dress only it wasn’t.
Everything
was wrong, including the presence of a large population of West Indians in the
north-east in the early 60’s.
But
what did that matter when there was a captive audience for a major rant against
fascist, racist pigs?
I
hoped that it was a one-off and that the second episode would have got back to
a bit of detective work fronted by an actor of limited range but OK for this
light-weight stuff.
Boy,
did I get that wrong.
Next
was class. Every stereotype was there; the elderly eccentric aristo who
consorted with the peasantry in the village pub and played with motor bikes (how
plebeian), his much younger bitch of a second wife who insisted on being
addressed as ‘your Ladyship’ and constantly ranted about the lower orders
really being governed by the aristocracy, the layabout son sent down from
Oxford and chucked out of the Guards whose upturned car was found in a river with
a dead girl inside, Chappaquiddick-style. She would have been ’beneath him’ if
you get my drift.
I
gave up part-way through and went over to Johnny Cash.
Now,
I have nothing against bias. We are all biased one way or another. It adds
colour and debate, and life would be very dull without it.
What
I won’t accept is a public broadcaster being outrageously biased and always
one-way, of ludicrous plot-lines, unbelievable stories, and sloppy
production that suggests a total contempt for the viewer or professional
incompetence or, more likely, both.
No comments:
Post a Comment