An opinion poll
asking ‘Is immigration a good or bad thing’ would almost certainly get a
massive ‘bad’ vote, especially if conducted for the Daily Mail. This is simple
knee-jerk stuff. Reality, as ever, is rather more complicated. Some immigration
is important – indeed, vital – to the future progress of Britain, Some is not
only harmful but can be positively dangerous.
It is a topic that
successfully eludes intelligent debate. Since Enoch’s chillingly prophetic
speech all these years ago ‘immigration’ has been taboo, at least amongst the
chattering classes. Brown and Blair were able to open the floodgates with
scarcely a peep from the Tories. But popular opinion is over-riding the
hang-ups of the metropolitan elites, and it is now one of the three top political
issues. UKIP in particular makes sure that it is high on the agenda for future
elections.
Instead of
faffing-about, like the Tory female last week who accused Nigel Farage of
spreading alarm and despondency just by mentioning the ’I’ word, a smattering
of cogent policy might concentrate minds rather more than has been so in the
past.
The core fact is that
those who are here are (mostly) going to stay. There is nothing to do about it,
so take it out of the equation.
The next important
realisation is that some immigration is good and some is bad.
The ‘good’ include
hard-working Eastern Europeans who,
contrary to tabloid opinion, do not depress wages and steal jobs rightly
belonging to the British. The evidence to support such a view simply does not
exist. The reason that these people fill British jobs is not because employers
recruit them in preference to natives, but because they can’t find enough
educated and skilled workers at home
They are also very
fecund. Those who feel that we need more white Christians and fewer brown
Moslems need look no further than the Poles, who are enthusiastic breeders.
The ‘good’ include
university students and pupils at our public schools, a major financial
resource for our struggling education
system. Current immigration policy is to make things tough for them.
And the ‘good’
definitely include the uber-rich who are pouring vast amounts of investment
into UK, especially London. They are the people who will buy a penthouse at the
top of one of the skyscrapers being built (with foreign money) all over central
London, and think little of paying £50 million for a pied-a-terre for their shopping
trips from Mumbai, Shanghai, Dubai and Moscow. The tax-take alone is
impressive. It is estimated that Chelsea and Kensington collected more than
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland put together.
Finally, we should
not overlook the myriads of scientists, academics, professionals of every
stripe, and entrepreneurs who have enriched Britain over many years. The UK
also seems to have a particular attraction for film stars, actors, directors
and others who find a certain satisfaction in our eccentric life-style, like
Sam and Zoe Wanamaker who gave us The Globe Theatre, and Sir John Getty, the
only American ever to have understood cricket, and who gave £140 million to artistic
causes!
The undesirables?
Top of the list must
be Eastern European gypsies, or ‘Roma, as PC now dictates that we call them. Political
figures as diverse as Farage and Blunkett have warned that the extremely
anti-social conduct by Roma could easily lead to unrest and violence. This
deserves attention; Roma crime is typically street crime, pick-pocketing,
begging, ATM fraud, all of which are liable to bring the victim into
confrontation with the assailant, sometimes with inevitable results.
This may be where
Enoch’s warning will come back to haunt us – ‘I dreamt I saw the River Tiber
foaming with much blood’.
Then there’s the
great unwashed and uneducated from Africa and Asia – and elsewhere. There are
the phony asylum-seekers and benefits-bludgers, Somalis, Yemenis and other
security risks who have no Commonwealth or any other connection with Britain.
And perhaps most of
all, we don’t want any more Kashmiri peasants who have created a massive ghetto
in Bradford. More than 40% were born in Pakistan, so integration never gets traction.
These are Mirpuris who continue with their own customs and social structure no matter
how long they live in England. The main force is the biraderis, their clan-system. They cling to the old ways. They
persist with first-cousin marriage, leading to a high incidence of birth defects.
They arrange marriage partners, run the mosques, and control local politics.
A sensible
immigration policy requires us to be choosy!
No comments:
Post a Comment