As I
predicted a week or so ago, we are now getting the tear-jerking,
withers-wringing appeal for aid to starving Somalis. There’s Angela Rippon on
radio (remember her?) telling us with breathy urgency that unless we open our
wallets now Amina’s starving waif will die of hunger, thirst, and
general shortage of breath.
So what are
the realities?
First,
Somalia is not a country. It is a geographical concept. It has no government,
no recognisable administration, no law and order, no public safety, nothing
that comprises ‘the state’. It has been engaged in apocalyptic fighting between
rival clans and between religious fanatics for almost ever. There are no
goodies and baddies here; only baddies and baddies.
So who will
administer the feeding programmes?
The locals?
If so I would not rate highly the prospects of the food getting to the
neediest.
The aid
agencies? It is difficult to see how it would be wise or safe or even possible
to deploy foreign aid workers in all the current circumstances, so distribution
would have to be done by locals. See above.
And then
Somalia is not short of money. It has a
highly profitable shipping industry in which foreign shipping companies pay
huge sums of money to get their ships back. It is sitting on billions of
dollars-worth of ships pending settlement with the owners. If it has to spend
money on food it will have less to spend on terrorism and funding Al Qaeda.
Now I see
that Wateraid has climbed on the bandwagon. Twenty-odd years ago I worked very
closely with Wateraid on an EU-sponsored committee aimed at water development
in poor countries. It was the charity of the water industry that makes vast
profits, and the charity projects were funded entirely by the water companies.
So what are they now doing by begging off the public?
Perhaps the
needs of Somalis could be met by their co-religionists, as they conspicuously
failed to do in the Pakistan flooding.
It would
seem that there is not too much concern in neighbouring Ethiopia, where it
hasn’t rained for 18 months. One million people are in need of water plus
100,000 Somali refugees.
The
government is anxious to privatise the state breweries, the likely buyer being
Heineken for $164 million. They use vast quantities of water and so have been
given exclusive rights to the only efficient deep well in the region but the
local population is rationed. The regime has also abrogated colonial-era
treaties governing the water flow in the Nile and has embarked on a major
programme of dam-building, not primarily for water supply but for power.
Egypt and
Sudan are not best pleased.
No comments:
Post a Comment