There was a much –publicised
scandal recently following a piece by the egregious Ms Alibhai-Brown (described
by the DT as ‘the stupidest womanin Britain)
in The Independent, in which she
sought to justify stoning women for adultery. A joking twitter message that Mrs
A-B herself should be stoned brought about the arrest of the tweeter on a
complaint of Mrs A-B who plainly believed that freedom of speech was her sole
prerogative. After the Woodentops had held the guy for some time it was
eventually (very eventually) decided not to proceed against him.
(I believe that stoning as a
punishment still exists in the Torah, although it is believed that the Jews
have not done any since the Pythons made ‘Life of Brian’).
I now have evidence that this
whole issue of stoning is based on mistranslations of the various ancient
documents that advocate it. My reasoning is thuswise.
Some while back there was
archaeological study of ancient pottery fragments found in Israel. They put a
whole new slant on the anointing ceremony (he anointeth thy head with oil etc).
It was discovered on chemical analysis that the oil was actually cannabis oil.
Whoever had this stuff rubbed into his cranium must have been away with the
fairies in no time.
We must also remember that
‘magic mushrooms’ have been known since antiquity for their hallucinogenic
effects. The ancients were clearly hop-heads of the first water.
It is obvious therefore was
that the religious injunction was not that the offenders should be stoned, but
that they should GET stoned.
So that clears that up.
No comments:
Post a Comment