Putin
has driven not so much a horse-and-cart as a T34 tank through the established
world order that tries to ensure that disputes between nations are resolved by
diplomacy, negotiation and international law, but there will be no dramatic response
by the EU or the US. Instead there will be very limited visa bans on the
kleptocracy close to Putin, and the main thrust will be to attack Russia’s
ambitions to be increasingly influential and respected in the world by freezing
it out of bodies such as the G8, and projecting it as a gangster state. Russia
longs for respectability and to become a super-power once more, but the Crimean
adventure has scuppered that.
America
maybe more enthusiastic about economic sanctions than Europe because it has not
much to lose. By contrast the City is the largest international financial
centre in the world, and Russian business is massive. Action against it would
be very damaging to the British economy, and could see an outflow of money to competing
centres such as Hong Kong, Singapore, and Dubai. European trade with Russia is
ten times America’s.
Using
the economy as a political weapon is very dangerous strategy. World economies
are intertwined and mutually-dependent. Using its energy resources as
retaliation for Western measures will cause long-term damage to Russia as
foreign customers seek alternative supplies. Stand by for a rapid rise in
American gas exports.
One
great benefit arising from the crisis is likely to be an added stimulus for
fracking, as the west attempts to reduce reliance on Russian energy.
Where
next? The Sunday Times is speculating Latvia.
Not
a chance. Entering a NATO country really would mean a shooting war. Putin will
concentrate on his ambition to create a Eurasian Trade Zone, mirroring the ECM.
He will look east to the various ‘stans’ of Central Asia plus Azerbaijan. So
the focus will be Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and
Kyrgyzstan, a pretty doleful bunch.
Kazakhstan
is the best of the lot. It is a major oil producer, the world’s largest source
of uranium, and generally has a sound economy. It also has corrupt elections,
which would suit Putin very well. About 25% of the people are Russian-speakers.
Turkmenistan
is the 4th largest producer of natural gas and has 700 million tons of
oil reserves. It is also a major exporter of electricity. It is to all intents
and purposes a one-party dictatorship, ranks only after North Korea for
suppression of press freedom, and is thoroughly corrupt. Again, this ticks all
Putin’s boxes.
Uzbekistan
is a Soviet-style authoritarian state. It has gold, oil and uranium. Its human
rights record is abysmal. It is a Third-World country, with a GDPppp of a mere
$3800.
Tajikistan?
Not much to offer there; the poorest of the Central Asian republics with a
large drugs production and not much else. It has a GDPppp of only $2500. It is
heavily dependent on foreign remittances from migrant workers in Russia, so it
will do whatever Putin says.
He
may soon gobble up Moldova, Europe’s poorest country.
So
that moth-eaten collection would be the new Russian empire.
And
now that Putin has asserted his ‘right’ to seize the Crimea because the
majority population is Russian, will the same principle apply to Chechnya where
only 2% of the population is Russian? I thought not! But he might have opened
the door to potential trouble between India and Pakistan, India and China,
China and Japan, China and South Korea,
all of which have simmering boundary disputes.
The
back-story is that Putin is in deep trouble at home. The economy is lop-sided
and will be badly affected if oil falls below $80 pb. The rule of law is non-existent.
There are frequent human rights abuses and corrupt elections. The demographics are
awful; the fertility rate is below replacement rate; male life expectancy is 64
years largely caused by too much vodka. Russians are not happy. So he is
falling back on the old diversionary tactic of causing trouble abroad.
Putin’s
legacy may well be the unleashing of the Russian Spring that will sweep him
away, together with his coterie of crooks.
No comments:
Post a Comment