Everybody
who blogs, twitters, or uses Facebook (or any other ‘social media’) would be
wise to consider the recent case of Cairns v. Modi.
Chris
Cairns is a cricketer; Lalit Modi is a former chairman of the IPL.
Modi
tweeted (or twittered) that Cairns had been involved in match-fixing.
Cairns
sued for defamation and won.
Lodi’s
24-word tweet is likely to cost him over £1 million.
This
should make us think quite hard about what we publish on-line, because although
we may have the illusion of anonymity and that we are merely addressing a few
‘friends’ or ‘followers’ we are in fact exposing ourselves in a very public way
– and permanently, because what you put on the internet stays there. What’s
more, the web-site can easily hand over your name and address.
You
may be tempted to put things on the internet that you would not say to a
person’s face from behind an imagined cloak of anonymity.
But
a libel is a libel. If you blog something libellous a plaintiff might first go
for the web-site, in which case it would most likely join you in the action.
When
I was advising politicians about whether they should say or do something, I
would tell them to ask themselves how it would look on the front page of the
local newspaper.
No comments:
Post a Comment